Sunday, April 27, 2014

You Can't Tell The Players Without A Program

As I wrote in an earlier post, most of my jobs these days are multi-camera sitcoms.  Things have changed a lot over the years in this little subset of the TV business, and not the least of these changes is in job titles.

In the quaint ole days I would have been called an LD (Lighting Director), but since near the end of the last century I started being called a DP (Director of Photography).  My duties have expanded beyond what I did as an LD back in the day, though I certainly don't have as much authority or responsibility as I do when I am lucky enough to DP a single camera show.  Don't get me wrong, you'll have to pry this job title, like Charlton Heston's gun, out of my cold dead hands.  No, I don't own Charlton Heaton's gun.

Anyway, the guys who control how the pictures coming out of the cameras looked used to be called Engineers.  The boss engineer was called an EIC (Engineer in Charge), not to be confused with the production company or network's EIC (Executive in Charge). The Engineer was often found hanging around with another guy, called the Maintenance Engineer, who might fix stuff when it broke.  

I once heard a Producer making an issue of the fact that he never saw the Maintenance Engineer working.  The Engineer told the Producer that the last thing he should want is to see the Maintenance Engineer busy, because it probably meant that the shoot had been stopped cold.  But I digress.

These days the engineer is now called the VC, not to be confused with the folks who ran the Hanoi Hilton, though there can be similarities in temperament. It stands for Video Controller.  Sometimes they are instead called DIT's - despite not being cute and stupid (generally they are neither) - short for Digital Imaging Technicians.  If a show has both a VC and a DIT, the DIT is the guy who you never want to see actually doing any work.

Shows used to have cameramen and camerawomen.  Now they have Camera Ops.  That may be because WAAY back in the day DP's were sometimes called cameramen, and it would be confusing to have 5 cameramen on a show with 4 cameras.

We used to have TD's (Technical Directors) who switched the cameras for a recorded line cut.  Often, they were also the EIC.  It was a highly respected position, except by the engineer, who generally didn't respect anyone.  The TD sat in the control room at a big switcher next to the Director, who sat next to the AD (Associate Director), who sat next to the Script PA. The director would communicate to the set through the Stage Manager. 

Now the TD is an Audience Switcher who is all alone in the control room at a teeny little panel.  No one thinks twice about them, except the VC &/or DIT who respects them even less than a TD. The Director works from the floor next to Camera or Technical Coordinator who used to be the AD, who is next to the Script Supervisor who used to be the Script PA.  The Stage Manager is now the AD, but not the AD who used to be in the control room who is now the Camera or Technical Coordinator, but an Assistant Director.

They all work behind rolling podiums that are actually lecterns.

Just about the only thing that hasn't changed is the shows themselves.


Friday, April 18, 2014

Age, Ambition, and Acceptance

I've been working in the TV business for over 30 years now.  I mostly came up through lighting, first as an electrician, then lighting director, then lighting designer, ld/business owner, and finally as a dp, with a little detour through directing and producing.

I always considered myself pretty ambitious.  I wanted to be able to keep moving up and do better and bigger shows, and open new doors along the way.  

To some extent that has happened.  I spent time early on doing lighting and camera on corporate videos and have wound up as a dp mostly on sitcoms.  Along the way, I've done some crap, but also got to work on some shows that had real entertainment and even social value.

I haven't gotten to do much in the way of big entertainment shows or, as much as I wanted to, really break through as a single camera DP.  

Now, well into my 50's I know that achieving those goals is pretty unlikely, and getting even less so with every passing day .  But, what's interesting - at least to me - is that I've become okay with that.  I'm pretty happy to keep chugging along doing what I'm doing.  The commitment to do my craft as well as I can hasn't diminished at all, but the real hunger for advancement has.

My father in law used to say there's always someone richer, thinner, and better looking.  I guess I'm lucky that I'm relatively content with my bank account, looks, and weight.  Well, maybe not my weight.

Saturday, April 12, 2014

This is not my beautiful house


I've been bouncing from coast to coast for almost 2 years now. 

Since May of 2012, not including the house in Hastings, I've lived in 7 different places, and have to be out of the one I'm in now on May 31.  

3 have been really nice - that is, if you don't mind the occasional murder/suicide, but that's a story for another day - the others ranged from fairly crummy to pretty okay.

People I meet ask me where I live, and I honestly say I really don't know. My house and history are certainly back east, but I've only been there about 5 months of the last 2 years.  My car died a couple of months ago, and the new one has a California registration.  I can fill in an online USPS change of address form with my eyes closed.

It's the state of my career, and perhaps to a lesser extent, that of the TV business that has required/allowed me to live this way.

As I said previously, we must adapt and embrace change or suffer the consequences, and I guess that goes for life as well as technology.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Aphorisms 1 & 1a
1 -   Darwin taught us that adaption is crucial to survival.
1a - Embrace new technologies or go the way of the dinosaur.

I've been working with a lot of contemporaries who are bemoaning the newer low cost alternatives to "conventional" digital broadcast cameras, fearing that DSLR's, iPhones, GoPros, and the like are going to put them out of work.

In the last year I've used footage from FS700's, 5d's, 7d's, GoPros,  Flips, 120 & 30 fps from my iPhone 5s,  and the Sony QX100 Lens Cam on narrative broadcast shows intercut with Reds, Alexas, F55's, C300's and Sony 1500's.  Usually the intent is not for the footage to be seamless with the "real" cameras, but sometimes it is, and it works.

Can't wait to get my hands on Sony's new alpha 7s full frame mirrorless dslr/4k UHD camera.  

It isn't using these tools that will threaten your career.  It's not knowing HOW and WHEN to use them that'll make you irrelevant.




Welcome

So I guess, at this stage of my life, my arrogance has reached the point to make me feel that I have some things to say about my craft, and the TV biz in general that others might find useful, or at least amusing enough to bother to read on a semi-regular basis.
I'll do my best to keep things concise - obviously not my strong suit - and provide a mix of opinion,  fact, aphorisms, and anecdotes on a reasonably consistent schedule.
Hoping you'll follow, and thanks.

Bb